If an Azerbaijani is returned, it is implicitly assumed that our compatriots held in Baku prisons have committed "maliciousness". political scientist

Political scientist Suren Surenyants writes on his Facebook page: Pashinyan gave a "fantastic" answer as to why the last Azerbaijani prisoner of war was returned without reciprocity from Baku.

He says the Azerbaijani was misled, there was no malice in his actions, and that is why he was returned, not exchanged.

The version of the error of the Azerbaijani soldier is not questioned, but if he is not exchanged, but returned, then it is indirectly assumed that our compatriots kept in Baku prisons committed "maliciousness".

By the same logic, if the demand of Mustafaev's office is legitimate from the point of view of the internationally recognized borders of Armenia, its unilateral, non-reciprocal satisfaction will legitimize the occupation of Armenian territories.

I approached the questions with this logic, according to Pashinyan's formula, not with the logic of "axioms", but with the logic of "theorems".