Enemy countries are implementing a policy towards the existence of an uncontrolled terrorist threat in Armenia. expert

Regional issues expert Armen Petrosyan writes on his Facebook page:

"Terrorism" vs "armed attack"

While disseminating, analyzing and evaluating the information about the armed attack against the Nor Nork Police Department on March 24, many media, analysts, social network users presented the attack under the term "terrorism". According to the information spread in the mass media, the investigation initiated by the Investigative Committee is being carried out under the same definition.

Meanwhile, is it correct for the world and Armenia in this sensitive period of history to present such an act under the term "terrorism", which can bring serious image and propaganda consequences to our country in several dimensions at the same time, from tourism to security/strategy?

Especially when a number of hostile countries are implementing a coordinated policy towards the presence of an uncontrolled terrorist threat in Armenia, presenting the territory of our country as a favorable haven for Armenian and "international terrorist groups".

Let's leave the legal assessment of the act to the lawyers, especially when the armed confirmation that took place can certainly be presented under other wordings as well.

But here it is mostly about the RESPONSIBILITY OF PUBLIC SPEECH, which is seriously lacking in us."