The issue of handing over the villages is a small component of the policy that has been carried out before our eyes for many years. Hrant Khachatryan

It is necessary to leave the agenda dictated by the Armenian authorities and the outside world, develop an Armenian agenda and speak within that framework. Hrant Khachatryan, deputy of the 2-3 convocations of the National Assembly of Armenia, politician, mentioned this in a conversation with "Detq", referring to the development of events in Tavush.

"The issue of Tavush, the issue of handing over the villages is a small component of the policy that they have been conducting before our eyes for many years, because such illegal and illogical practices cannot happen for so long if we live in a society with logic," said our the interlocutor, emphasizing that it is not necessary to discuss the issue of Tavush separately, but to focus on the formation of the Armenian agenda, in which case the problem of "handing over land" will not arise.

"Even if there are opposing agendas, even if there is an internal debate, the agenda should come from the goal, and the goal has always been so clear that there has not even been a public debate on the goal for more than 3 decades," said Khachatryan.

He emphasized that when forming the Armenian agenda, one should distinguish between primary and secondary issues. "There are comments that have nothing to do with Armenia. For example, everyone connects the Armenian agenda with the fact that who will win the Ukrainian war, Russia or the West, but that is a tertiary, quaternary question, it is still important, but it cannot be a primary question. But it is clear that politicians are delaying their activities, waiting to see who will win in Ukraine. But I repeat, it is not a primary issue for the Armenian agenda.

I think that those who are waiting for foreign agendas should be pushed to the background, that is, people who have expectations from these agendas should stay away from state administration. Those people who are extremely polarized around foreign agendas, we cannot influence them and we cannot form any real expectation through them, and then turn that expectation into an action plan and implement it.

There is a view that these polarized groups must destroy each other so that each can, by involving the others, save the country. There is another point of view, that one discredits the other so much that people no longer pay attention to them. "Both are unacceptable, because in both cases, that group of people is excluded from our common resource, from our account, because the existing poles are an important part of our resource," Khachatryan noted.

According to the observation of our interlocutor, it is obvious that the majority of the population of Armenia does not become active because they want to distance themselves from both poles. According to him, now we need organizers who can work not with the highlighted poles, but with the people who are sleeping and can activate them.

"I think the reason that the Armenian resources are not consolidated at a critical moment is that there are no people raising the flag of victory. For several years now, both poles have been working to make the ununited or unformed mass have the maximum antipathy towards the other pole, and both poles are achieving that goal. To achieve this, they resort to all possible means. As a result, people do not want to join either of the two poles," he said.

According to Hrant Khachatryan, the ruling party today has neither legal nor moral right to spread such pessimistic sentiments. "They say peace, but today nobody in the world understands that optimism, because humanity has reached the limit of using nuclear weapons, and that optimism is not understandable at all. Talking about peace today is not only incomprehensible, but also ridiculous, that is, saying peace without any basis and making concessions for that peace are incomprehensible."