The Armenian orientation is not on the agenda in Brussels. Political scientist: "Armradio.am"

The experts do not consider the recent negotiations between Pashinyan and Aliyev through the mediation of the President of the European Council to be successful, they consider especially some of Charles Michel's assessments after the meeting to be problematic. The President of the European Council equally emphasized the opening of the Lachin road and the readiness of Azerbaijan to carry out humanitarian supplies through Aghdam.

Unlike the previous negotiations, this time Charles Michel spoke not about all the prisoners of war, but about the servicemen who accidentally crossed the border.

The fears of the experts are also confirmed by the responses from Moscow and Baku.

Political scientist Hrant Mikayelyan calls the Brussels tripartite negotiations a failure. In his opinion, the Armenian side has accepted the European agenda, in which Azeri approaches are dominant.

After the tripartite negotiations with the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan, the head of the Council of Europe, Charles Michel, spoke about the need to open the Lachin Corridor, but equally emphasized the possibility of humanitarian supplies through Aghdam. This thesis was put forward by the Azerbaijani side on the eve of the meeting.

"When they talk about traffic through Aghdam, it means that the blockade of Artsakh is not a red line. Here, the EU assumes a proactive pro-Azerbaijani position, the main goal of which is geopolitics, and not Artsakh issues. "Azerbaijan's agenda includes several more points, which of course have not been resolved there, for example, so to speak, in the matter of the Zangezur Corridor, but it can be said that Azerbaijan was able to make progress in these negotiations."

Azeri expert Tatev Hayrapetyan also referred to Charles Michel's statement about carrying out humanitarian supplies through Aghdam. He considered the wording of the President of the European Council a literal repetition of the Azerbaijani agenda, and the EU platform as the most unsuccessful of all negotiation platforms.

Full article at source site